Philosophical Assertions I Am Not, I say NOT, Defending Today

The problem of logical omniscience (and  weakened forms thereof) are the elephant in the room in discussions of the epistemic significance of disagreement.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Philosophical Assertions I Am Not, I say NOT, Defending Today

  1. Are you asserting but not endorsing this? Throwing it out for consideration?

  2. No, I am endorsing. I’m not defending. If there’s a theory that says the former requires the latter, then I’m committed to asserting that this theory is false.